What If It’s True?
"The world is not the way they tell you it is."
- Adam Smith, author of "The Wealth of Nations", published 1776
"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."
- Benjamin Disraeli, British statesman and twice prime minister (1868, 1874-1880)
What shall we make of sentiments like those expressed, above? Are they nothing more than paranoid rumors, or is there actually some substance behind the warnings they espouse? Consider the following:
"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government."
- Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberger meeting at Evian, France on May 21, 1992.
The above quote was transcribed from a tape recording made by a Swiss delegate present at that meeting. To me, Kissinger is saying, essentially, "to keep the masses under governmental control, continue to keep some looming danger alive in their minds so that they will always look to government for protection and guidance." That's quite an agenda, wouldn't you say?
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be lead to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
- H. L. Mencken, b.1880-d.1956
Now ask yourself, "Where do I, a mere citizen, fit into this agenda?" Let's consider another quote as we endeavor to answer that question:
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years....It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."
- David Rockefeller speaking at the Bilderberger meeting in June 1991 in Baden Baden, Germany.
Also in attendance at this meeting were Dan Quayle and Bill Clinton, who were introduced to these international traitors by none other than Vernon Jordan himself. If you or I attended meetings, held in total secrecy, surrounded by guards armed with UZIs and other assorted assault weapons, and planned to eventually replace our national government with a global one, we would very likely be tried for sedition.
Getting back to our question of where I, as a citizen, fit into this agenda... Well, apparently nowhere significant! As a citizen, I have no referendum within which to express my views. This agenda is not a matter of public record where mainstream media is free to investigate and publish its findings in a non-censored environment.
Without wanting to sound too radical, let me say that such covert governmental activities feel more like despotism and tyranny than they feel like an honest expression of a representative government..
Essentially, key political figures decided to disregard their oaths to serve their constituency in order to express a higher allegiance to this plan for a "world government", whether we, the people, wanted one or not. According to the quote uttered in 1991, "for almost 40 years", has now in 2006 become "almost 55 years"! Imagine that: for more than half a century there have been key people in government who have been working behind our backs to achieve an end that they already suspected we'd object to!
The CIA seems to believe (or at least, it did in 1988) that mere citizens ought not be kept informed about some of the things that its represented officials were involved in, as evident by this quote:
"We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things the general public does not need to know, and shouldn't. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows."
- Katherine Graham, speech to CIA recruits in 1988
I ask you: is this a government that can be trusted? Apparently NOT.
Well then... if our government is something other than what it appears to be, just what sort of government is it? Here's one person's interpretation of American politics:
"In the United States we have, in effect, two governments… We have the duly constituted Government… Then we have an independent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to Congress by the Constitution."
- Congressman Wright Patman
Are these the words of a jaded man or is he trying to tell us something? It seems that Henry Ford knew what was meant by Congressman Patman's words, because Ford himself is on record as saying:
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
- Henry Ford
It seems that there may be "two governments" in operation after all: the government that appears to conform to the structure that our forefathers crafted for us (of, by, for the people, split into the legislative, executive, and judicial branches for checking and balancing itself), and the "other" government that actually controls the former:
"Neither Presidents, Congressmen, nor Secretaries of the Treasury direct the Federal Reserve. In the matters of money, the Federal Reserve directs them."
- Gary Allen, from “None Dare Call It Conspiracy”
Further evidence of this "money controls all else" ideal may be seen in sentiments, as expressed by these notable individuals:
"Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws."
- Baron M. A. Rothschild, b.1743-d.1812
"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is master of all its legislation and commerce."
- President James Garfield, b.1831-d.1881
But I suppose that even after all of this information has come to your awareness, you'll just be happy to forget it all and go about your life as if none of this had ever had any impact on you at all. You, my ignorant, apathetic citizen, are the whole reason why we're in the mess we're in today!
by
Richard H.
To submit any sort of writing of your own, send your stuff to:
drs@deadrebelsociety.com
Please send in doc- or rtf-formats only.
What is this, 1967?
 | ||||||
